Adley Gray Logo
YOUR PROBLEM OUR CHALLENGE

Indecent Images Solicitors

Being the subject of an investigation regarding indecent images can be extremely stressful. If you are found guilty of possessing or making indecent images, you could face a prison sentence. Our expert Indecent Images Solicitors are ready to help you navigate this challenge.

In addition, being involved in an investigation of this nature, could result in serious damage to your reputation and could have disastrous consequences for your personal and professional life. Seeking legal advice from our expert indecent images solicitors experienced in dealing with this type of case, as early on as possible, is essential. This way, your solicitor can work with you to prepare your defence and achieve the best possible outcome in your circumstances.

 

Accused of serious sexual offences? Need urgent help?

Your future could be on the line – don’t delay and get in touch now on our 24/7

Phone Line:  03333 050 134

Email: web@adleygray.com

 

What are indecent images?

In recent years, due to the widespread use of the internet and social media, the sharing of indecent images has increased dramatically.

The type of images involved is one of the most important factors when it comes to what kind of punishment to expect, if you are convicted of possessing or making indecent images.

Indecent images are now split into three different categories, ranging from the most severe (category A) to the least severe (category C).

Category A – Images involving penetrative sexual activity; images involving sexual activity with an animal or sadism.

Category B – Images involving non-penetrative sexual activity.

Category C – Other indecent images not falling within categories A or B.

Indecent images can involve both children and animals. As well as photographs, indecent images can include animations, moving images and what is known as ‘pseudo-photography’.

Pseudo-photographs are photographs which are made by a computer but which appear to be real.

If in doubt speak to our expert indecent images solicitors.

 

Need Urgent Advice?

Call Our Rapid Response Team

24/7 Phone Line  03333 050 134

 

What does the law say about indecent images?

Indecent image offences are detailed in the Protection of Children Act 1978 and the Criminal Justice Act 1988.

When it comes to indecent image offences, the law makes a distinction between possessing indecent images and the making of them. The offences related to indecent images broadly fall into one of these two areas.

Possession of indecent images involves the images in question being in the “custody or control” of the accused i.e. they can access or retrieve the images. The accused must know that they have possession of the images.

Offences relating to the making of indecent images are actually divided between production and distribution. The offences involving the making of indecent images can occur in many different ways. Making an indecent image can happen, for example, when someone downloads an image from the internet. This is because the image is “made” on the device when the person downloads it. This could happen deliberately or accidentally when someone visits a webpage. This means that someone could make an indecent image without knowing they were doing so.

Our expert indecent images solicitors can assist you further.

This is a particularly complex area of law, which makes seeking specialist advice from a solicitor with a thorough understanding of the technology involved, crucial.

Various different activities which previously fell under the offence of indecent assault in the 1956 Act, are now detailed as separate offences in the 2003 Act, including child sex offences and assault by penetration.

As a result, the Section 3 offence of sexual assault (from the 2003 Act) is now mainly used to prosecute less serious kinds of sexual assault than the old offence of indecent assault.

 

What is the sentence for possessing indecent images?

According to our expert indecent images solicitors, if you are found guilty of possessing indecent images you could be given a prison sentence. Whether this is the case – and, if so, how long your imprisonment will be – will depend on factors such as the category and the number of images involved.

When sentencing someone for possession of an indecent image, the court will use the image category to determine a starting point. Then, it will adjust this starting point taking into account any aggravating or mitigating factors (more on this below).

The starting point for possession of a Category A image is 1 year in prison. The maximum sentence is 3 years in custody.

The possession of Category B indecent images has a starting point of 26 weeks in prison (with a maximum of 18 months).

For Category C possession, the starting point is a high level community order (with a maximum of 26 weeks).

If there is “sufficient prospect of rehabilitation” a community order with a sex offender treatment programme can be used as an alternative to a short or medium length prison sentence.

 

What is the sentence for making indecent images?

Again, this largely depends on the category of the images in question and whether the offence relates to distribution or production.

The starting point for the distribution of Category A indecent images is 3 years in prison. For production, it is 6 years.

For Category B indecent images, the distribution starting point is 1 year in prison and the production starting point is 2 years.

The Category C starting point is 13 weeks for distribution and 18 months for production.

Our expert indecent images solicitors help client nationwide with such challenges.

 

Facing criminal charges can be an overwhelming experience.

Call Our Rapid Response Team

24/7 Phone Line  03333 050 134

 

What are the aggravating factors for indecent image offences?

Aggravating features, which can result in a more lengthy prison sentence for indecent image related offences include:

  • Previous convictions
  • Age of the child or their vulnerability (this is given significant weight)
  • The child is drugged or intoxicated
  • The pain or distress the child is suffering
  • A large amount of indecent images involved
  • The indecent images in question involve moving images
  • The child is known to the offender
  • There are many different victims
  • Putting the indecent images in a place where there is a potential for lots of people to see them

 

What are the mitigating factors for indecent image offences?

Mitigating factors, which can reduce the sentence for an indecent images offence include:

  • No previous convictions
  • Previous good character (the more serious the offence, the less weight this may be given)
  • Remorse
  • A mental disorder or learning disability

Your future could be on the line – don’t delay call our expert indecent images solicitors now.

What are the defences for offences related to indecent images of children?

Defences to offences regarding indecent images of children include legitimate reason and lack of awareness.

For the former, the accused must prove that he had a legitimate reason for the conduct involving the indecent images. For example, someone may say that the reason they possessed the indecent images was because they were conducting research.

In the case of lack of awareness, the accused would have to prove that they had not seen the photographs and did not know (or did not suspect) that they were indecent.

 

Speak to our Expert Indecent Images Solicitors in:

London

Leeds

Manchester

 

 

Will I go on the Sex Offenders’ Register if I am convicted of an offence relating to indecent images?

Your name may be added to the Sex Offenders Register, depending on the offence.

 

Learn more about why you should instruct Adley Gray.

 

Useful Links

What is rape?

What is an Indecent Assault?

What is Sexual Abuse?

When is Historic Sexual Crime an offence?

 

 

Client was on bail for assaulting his infant son. Social services reported the claim, but there was no evidence, only the mother’s statement that the boy was injured by evening. Client explained the injury occurred when the boy fell off a bouncy castle, which was confirmed by four family members. By obtaining statements and submitting them to the police, we demonstrated the lack of evidence, and the case was dropped with no further action.


My client was accused of historic domestic abuse allegations. The police provided written disclosure in advance of an interview, and we were able to go through this and provide a four-page statement detailing evidence to the contrary on each allegation. The statement and evidence provided was so detailed that the police had no questions to put to my client, meaning that the interview process was far less stressful than he envisaged.


Client was on bail for domestic abuse in relation to his wife. This had been dragging on for some time. We were able to obtain the particulars of the allegations from the police and then to go through them with the client. We were then able to obtain evidence that contradicted the allegations, including statements from friends, which showed that the allegations could not be true and so the police took no further action against the client. By obtaining case details, going through these with the client, speaking to witnesses and obtaining corroborative evidence, it was possible to show that the allegations were fabricated.


Client was a health care professional employed on an agency basis. There was a historic allegation made by a former client. We were able to obtain the particulars of the allegation from the police and then to set about obtaining evidence from witnesses who could cast doubt on the allegations and serve this evidence upon the police and push them for a swift resolution. The client had been on a lengthy period of police bail at the time he instructed us, and we were able to speed the process up, which was key as the client was unable to work and had no income during the lengthy period of bail.


LET’S WORK
TOGETHER


Get in touch with us today to discuss how
we can help you solve your problem.

Get In Touch

Get in touch