Adley Gray Logo
YOUR PROBLEM OUR CHALLENGE

GBH and ABH Solicitors

GBH and ABH are both serious criminal offences. If you are accused of GBH or ABH, you should seek expert legal advice from our GBH and ABH Solicitors as soon as possible.

This can be a very complex area of law, with GBH and ABH (and common assault) carrying different levels of seriousness and sentencing. The level of injury the victim has suffered is the most important deciding factor when it comes to determining whether the offence is ABH or GBH.  In this article our expert GBH and ABH solicitors provide further detail.

 

Accused of serious assault of violence? Need urgent help?

Your future could be on the line – don’t delay and get in touch now on our 24/7

Phone Line:  03333 050 134

Email: web@adleygray.com

How to act

Defences for assaults such as GBH and ABH include consent, accident, self-defence and lawful sport. However, not all defences apply to every type of assault, so it is vital to seek legal advice about which defence could be available in your circumstances.

GBH and ABH – Understand the differences

GBH and ABH can both be committed either intentionally or recklessly. In the case of ABH, the victim’s injuries will be less severe than those in the case of GBH. However, these injuries must still be detrimental to the victim’s health.

What are GBH and ABH?

GBH (Grievous Bodily Harm) and ABH (Actual Bodily Harm) both fall under the umbrella of assault.

This can be a very complex area of law, with GBH and ABH (and common assault) carrying different levels of seriousness and sentencing.

The Criminal Justice Act 1988 states that both GBH and ABH are criminal offences.

Both GBH and ABH can result in a prison sentence, if you are found guilty.

GBH and ABH are determined by:

  • The injuries inflicted on the victim (if any)
  • The accused’s motivation for committing the offence
  • The level of foresight

What is the difference between GBH and ABH?

The level of injury the victim has suffered is the most important deciding factor when it comes to determining whether the offence is ABH or GBH.

In the case of GBH, the injuries will have caused serious detriment to the victim’s health.

The injuries in question can be physical, biological (disease transmission) or psychological (such as the incident resulting in post-traumatic stress disorder).

There are two types of GBH, as defined in the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 in Sections 18 and 20: with intent or without intent. Intent is determined by looking at the accused’s motives or desire.

In the case of Section 18 GBH, the prosecution must prove that the person accused of the offence intentionally inflicted grievous bodily harm. For a Section 20 GBH, the accused may have recklessly or maliciously done so, but without intent.

Section 18 – inflicting grievous bodily harm with intent – is a more serious offence.

In fact, GBH and ABH can both be committed either intentionally or recklessly. In the case of ABH, the victim’s injuries will be less severe than those in the case of GBH. However, these injuries must still be detrimental to the victim’s health.

The intention for GBH and ABH only needs to be to apply unlawful force (more on this below).

Due to the injuries for ABH being less serious than those for GBH, ABH is regarded as a less serious offence than GBH.

 

Who decides whether injuries are severe in GBH and ABH?

Normally, it will be the police or the CPS who will decide whether or not an injury is severe. They will use legal guidelines to determine this.

GBH injuries must have caused serious detriment to a victim’s health.

ABH injuries are less severe than those in GBH cases, but they must still be of provable detriment to the victim’s health.

 

Need Urgent Advice?

Call Our Rapid Response Team

24/7 Phone Line  03333 050 134

 

 

Are there any similarities between GBH and ABH?

Yes, both GBH and ABH can be committed recklessly or intentionally.

Having an intention to injure the victim is not necessary. The accused may simply have an intention to apply unlawful force.

For example, imagine you are at a restaurant and you get into an argument with someone for being too noisy at a nearby table. Things escalate and you push them. They fall and hit their head on the hard, tiled floor.

Imagine the victim is bruised due to the fall. Even though you may not have intended to injure the victim, you could be charged with ABH. Arguably, you could have caused the injury intentionally (you may not have intended to injure, but you may have intended to apply unlawful force) or recklessly. As long as the injury was not serious, you would be charged with ABH.

If your push had caused the person’s skull to fracture, this would fall into the more serious GBH offence category. As you had not intended for your actions to seriously injure the victim (assuming this is the case), this may be charged as per Section 20 of the Offences Against the Person Act (GBH without intent).

As you can see, GBH and ABH offences both have similarities and it is the injury which is the determining factor when deciding which offence to charge the perpetrator with.

 

What is the prison sentence for GBH and ABH?

GBH and ABH have different prison sentences, which reflect the differing severity of the injuries caused by each offence. Depending on the circumstances of the case, there may be no prison sentence at all.

If you are convicted of ABH, you may get anything from a community order to a 5-year prison sentence. If there are aggravating factors (the offence was religiously or racially motivated), you may face up to 7 years in custody. If it is a first offence, a prison sentence may be less likely.

Sentencing for GBH without intent (Section 20) can range from a community order to 5 years in prison (more if it is racially or religiously aggravated). For GBH with intent, the maximum prison sentence if found guilty is life in prison.

Normally, prison sentences for GBH convictions range from around 3 to 16 years.

If a weapon is used in an assault, this could result in the assault being charged as a more serious Section 18 offence.

 

Which court are GBH and ABH cases heard in?

ABH cases are heard in either a Crown Court or a Magistrates’ Court, depending on the seriousness of the case and whether there are any aggravating factors.

GBH without intent (Section 20 of the Offences Against the Person Act) can be heard at the Magistrates’ Court or the Crown Court, whereas GBH with intent (Section 18 of the Offences Against the Person Act) is heard in the Crown Court.

Learn more about why you should instruct Adley Gray.

 

Useful Links

What is Child Abduction?

What is Common Assault?

What is the difference between Murder and Manslaughter?

When is Domestic Violence an offence?

 

Which is the most serious offence out of GBH and ABH?

GBH and ABH are both serious criminal offences. However, out of GBH and ABH, ABH is regarded as the less serious offence, due to the injuries required for ABH being less severe than those involved in GBH cases.

 

Speak to our Expert GBH and ABH Solicitors in:

> London

> Leeds

> Manchester

 

 

What are the defences for GBH and ABH?

Defences for assaults such as GBH and ABH include consent, accident, self-defence and lawful sport.

However, not all defences apply to every type of assault, so it is vital to seek legal advice about which defence could be available in your circumstances.

 

Need Urgent Advice?

Call Our Rapid Response Team

24/7 Phone Line  03333 050 134

 

Client was on bail for assaulting his infant son. Social services reported the claim, but there was no evidence, only the mother’s statement that the boy was injured by evening. Client explained the injury occurred when the boy fell off a bouncy castle, which was confirmed by four family members. By obtaining statements and submitting them to the police, we demonstrated the lack of evidence, and the case was dropped with no further action.


My client was accused of historic domestic abuse allegations. The police provided written disclosure in advance of an interview, and we were able to go through this and provide a four-page statement detailing evidence to the contrary on each allegation. The statement and evidence provided was so detailed that the police had no questions to put to my client, meaning that the interview process was far less stressful than he envisaged.


Client was on bail for domestic abuse in relation to his wife. This had been dragging on for some time. We were able to obtain the particulars of the allegations from the police and then to go through them with the client. We were then able to obtain evidence that contradicted the allegations, including statements from friends, which showed that the allegations could not be true and so the police took no further action against the client. By obtaining case details, going through these with the client, speaking to witnesses and obtaining corroborative evidence, it was possible to show that the allegations were fabricated.


Client was a health care professional employed on an agency basis. There was a historic allegation made by a former client. We were able to obtain the particulars of the allegation from the police and then to set about obtaining evidence from witnesses who could cast doubt on the allegations and serve this evidence upon the police and push them for a swift resolution. The client had been on a lengthy period of police bail at the time he instructed us, and we were able to speed the process up, which was key as the client was unable to work and had no income during the lengthy period of bail.


LET’S WORK
TOGETHER


Get in touch with us today to discuss how
we can help you solve your problem.

Get In Touch

Get in touch