Adley Gray Logo
YOUR PROBLEM OUR CHALLENGE

0333 311 0985

Request Callback
Request Callback

Vandalism & Criminal Damage Solicitors

If you or someone you know has been accused of vandalism or criminal damage, it is vital that you contact a specialist vandalism and criminal damage solicitor straight away.

A solicitor with expertise in the law surrounding vandalism and criminal damage will spend time with you to fully understand all of the details of your case and will work with you to achieve the best possible outcome.

How The Law Defines Damage

A person is guilty of an offence if: they destroy or damage any property belonging to someone else without lawful excuse, either intending to destroy or damage the property, or being reckless as to whether the property would be destroyed or damaged

Act Quickly

If you are accused of criminal damage, it is crucial to seek legal advice from a specialist vandalism and criminal damage solicitor as soon as possible, so that they can help you to achieve the best possible outcome.

What is vandalism?

Vandalism is defined in the dictionary as the deliberate destruction or damage to public or private property. This includes, for example, breaking someone’s car windscreen.

Legally speaking, vandalism is actually an umbrella term used to describe a number of different criminal offences, all of which include some kind of reckless or intentional criminal damage to property.

What is criminal damage?

The term ‘criminal damage’ actually covers a wide range of offences which can vary in seriousness. These range from arson (criminal damage caused by fire) with the intent to endanger life (or recklessness as to whether life was endangered), to threats to destroy or damage property.

Criminal damage can result in minimal damage, where costs to replace/repair the damage are small. On the other hand, criminal damage caused by fire can not only cause significant damage and costly repairs, but can also endanger life.

How does the law define vandalism and criminal damage?

Most offences relating to criminal damage to property are detailed in the Criminal Damage Act 1971. Others are covered by the Malicious Damage Act 1861.

Section 1 (1) of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 details the offence of destroying or damaging property belonging to someone else. A person is guilty of an offence if:

they destroy or damage any property belonging to someone else without lawful excuse

either intending to destroy or damage the property

or being reckless as to whether the property would be destroyed or damaged

The Criminal Damage Act 1971 does not define the meaning of ‘damage’. However, damage can include not only permanent, but also temporary physical harm.

Damage could include, for example, the temporary damage of urinating all over the walls of a police cell.

What’s more, someone can commit an offence on their own property, if it also belongs to someone else. For example, if someone smashes the television that they own jointly with their spouse, either intentionally or recklessly, they could be prosecuted for criminal damage (as long as their spouse did not consent to the television being smashed).

Section 1(2) of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 details the offence of criminal damage with the intent to endanger life (or recklessness as to whether life was endangered), known as aggravated criminal damage.

A person commits this offence when they destroy or damage any property (their own or another person’s) without lawful excuse:

  1. intending to destroy or damage the property or being reckless as to whether the property would be damaged or destroyed and
  2. intending by the destruction or damage to endanger life or being reckless as to whether life would be endangered

Any offence under Section 1 (1) or Section 1 (2) which involves destroying or damaging property by fire will be charged as arson (detailed in Section 1 (3)).

Is there a defence to criminal damage?

Section 5 of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 details the defence to criminal damage. However, this does not apply to criminal damage with the intent to endanger life (or recklessness as to whether life would be endangered), under Section 1(2) of the Act (see above).

In some circumstances, it may be possible to argue that the criminal damage was not caused unlawfully.

Someone accused of criminal damage has lawful excuse if:

  • they believed that those who had the right to consent to the damage or destruction of the property in question had consented, or would have consented to the damage or destruction if they had known the circumstances, or
  • at the time of the act they believed that the property was in immediate need of protection and the means of protection would be reasonable having regard to all the circumstances

A firefighter, for example, would have lawful excuse to use water to put out a fire (the water in itself will cause damage).

What is the prison sentence for vandalism/criminal damage?

Criminal damage (excluding damage caused by a fire) which falls under Section 1 (1) of the Act, whose value does not exceed £5,000, has a maximum punishment of a fine and/or 3 months in prison. Depending on the nature of the damage, less serious cases could result in a discharge (release from court without any further action). Even if this happens, you will still have a criminal record.

However, if the criminal damage is racially or religiously aggravated, the maximum sentence increases to 14 years in prison.

If the criminal damage in question exceeds £5,000 (not including damage caused by fire), the maximum sentence is 10 years in prison. Again, depending on the nature of the criminal damage and the circumstances of the case, some prosecutions could result in a discharge.

As above, if the criminal damage is racially or religiously aggravated, the maximum sentence increases to 14 years in custody.

When deciding on a suitable sentence for criminal damage, the court will look at both culpability and harm factors, such as the level of planning involved in the attack and the level of distress caused.

The court will then consider whether the sentence should be adjusted due to any aggravating or mitigating factors. Aggravating factors, such as previous convictions and the large value of the items damaged to the victim (including sentimental value), can increase the punishment. Mitigating factors, such as lack of previous convictions and showing remorse, can decrease the sentence.

Many cases of vandalism involve young people under the age of 17. If this is the case, sentencing often focuses on preventative measures, which may include, for example, community service or on-the-spot fines.

Arson (criminal damage caused by fire) and criminal damage or arson with the intent to endanger life (or when the accused was reckless as to whether life was endangered) carry maximum sentences of life imprisonment.

Why do I need an experienced vandalism and criminal damage solicitor?

If you are accused of criminal damage, it is crucial to seek legal advice from a specialist vandalism and criminal damage solicitor as soon as possible, so that they can help you to achieve the best possible outcome.

Client was on bail for assaulting his infant son. Social services reported the claim, but there was no evidence, only the mother’s statement that the boy was injured by evening. Client explained the injury occurred when the boy fell off a bouncy castle, which was confirmed by four family members. By obtaining statements and submitting them to the police, we demonstrated the lack of evidence, and the case was dropped with no further action.

My client was accused of historic domestic abuse allegations. The police provided written disclosure in advance of an interview, and we were able to go through this and provide a four-page statement detailing evidence to the contrary on each allegation. The statement and evidence provided was so detailed that the police had no questions to put to my client, meaning that the interview process was far less stressful than he envisaged.

Client was on bail for domestic abuse in relation to his wife. This had been dragging on for some time. We were able to obtain the particulars of the allegations from the police and then to go through them with the client. We were then able to obtain evidence that contradicted the allegations, including statements from friends, which showed that the allegations could not be true and so the police took no further action against the client. By obtaining case details, going through these with the client, speaking to witnesses and obtaining corroborative evidence, it was possible to show that the allegations were fabricated.

Client was a health care professional employed on an agency basis. There was a historic allegation made by a former client. We were able to obtain the particulars of the allegation from the police and then to set about obtaining evidence from witnesses who could cast doubt on the allegations and serve this evidence upon the police and push them for a swift resolution. The client had been on a lengthy period of police bail at the time he instructed us, and we were able to speed the process up, which was key as the client was unable to work and had no income during the lengthy period of bail.

LET’S WORK
TOGETHER

Get in touch with us today to discuss how
we can help you solve your problem.

Get In Touch

Get in touch